Happy Easter holiday to everyone! Remember to bring enough e-juice on your trip (if you're going on one), and again ... do not try to vape the yellow snow :)


I've not been very found of coffee flavoured juices that I've tried earlier. I don't know why actually, cause I do love coffee. But, as I've said before, some flavours just don't work as e-juices for me even if I like "the original". So I didn't really expect much from the Café au lait either, and when I first tried it I must admit I wasn't really convinced either. Still, it wasn't that bad either, so I decided that I should vape the whole 10ml bottle before I made up my opinion. And you know what? I'm really starting to like this one. For some weird reason I didn't really get all the great flavours in the juice in the beginning. Now I get a dark, roasted coffee on the inhale and on the exhale the milk and a bit of sugar comes forth. And as usual from Decadent Vapours they've put a lot of flavour in there. To be honest, as I've said earlier I've been a bit of a sceptic towards coffee flavours but this one has got me thinking that I should try out some more. I do believe, however, that creating a good coffee e-juice is a bit difficult, but I also think that Decadent Vapors really nailed it with the Café au lait.
This is the second banoffee flavour I've tasted... but I still haven't tried the original, so it's still hard for me to tell you if Decadent Vapors have created a true banoffee flavour here. But... if they have, I believe I would love it. Judging by the other juices I've tried from them I suspect they have nailed it though. This juice lives up to the little slogan printed on the little box it comes in: "Sweet gooey delight". It is a well balanced mix of sweet banana and caramel both playing an equally important role, although I would say that the banana is slightly more pronounced, which I believe it should be. I also get some subtle hints of pastry. Quite simply a delicious dessert vape.
As the description says, this is a tobacco and vanilla blend. For me it brings back some memories from when I started out vaping. One of the first flavours I kind of landed on as an all day vape was the "American Red" from DV (that was re-branded by Totally Wicked and named "Marlbury" back in the days). It's been ages since I vaped that juice so I can't really tell how similar it is, but there I definitely get some of the same flavours. Again, a very well balanced juice, and even thought the flavours are quite mild, it still feels like they've packed a lot of flavour in there. I wouldn't say it's a tobacco that aims to duplicate cigarettes, but I don't think that's what they are aiming for either. It's got a great sweet taste of vanilla without being too sweet, making it an excellent candidate for an all day juice for me.
"Non-smoking is the norm and e-cigarettes will derail that normality thinking, because it will attract especially young people to take up smoking," said Chan. "So I do not support that."I have to admit it is kind of scary that the WHO actually just completely ignores evidence, and common sense, and seemingly have no problem telling straight out lies to the public as long as it keeps their friends in Big Pharma happy. Because that's what this actually is: A straight out deliberate lie. The truth, as Dr. Farsalinos stated is this:
"there is not a single case of a never-smoker who used e-cigarettes and then became a smoker of tobacco cigarettes"... and in addition to that, it would make absolutely no sense to do so. Banning e-cigarettes for this reason makes about as much sense as banning soda because it's a gateway to alcohol addiction. I mean, seeing that kids mix whisky and Coke, the obvious thing to do would be to ban Coke right?
"I think that the WHO people should know better than kill alternatives to smoking cigarettes" - Jean-Francois EtterYou're absolutely right professor Etter, they most certainly should. The problem is that the WHO is now just Big Pharmas propaganda machine. A German delegate, who wants to be anonymous, reveals their true agenda (after telling the same lies as Chan of course):
"e-cigarettes could easily be sold in pharmacies where you have a controlled product"... "that way my pharma-friends can easily have control of what products are sold and what information the customers get", she adds quietly to herself.

This study is extremely important, and I can reveal that the results were better than expected. It seems that the dry puff taste is a very sensitive natural defence mechanism, which is detected at very low levels of aldehydes. In that study, we have also measured the temperatures but we decided to report them in a separate paper.You might remember the horror-story about e-cigarette vapor containing lots of formaldehyde that was published in media all over the world in January. Dr. Farsalinos was quick to point out the obvious flaws and wrongly drawn conclusions back then, criticizing the misinformation published. Even the authors of the study kind of agreed to a lot of his criticism, giving us the real reason they published it: "We just wanted to get it out". Despite all this I still hear people claiming that e-cigarette vapor contains 10 times more carcinogens than cigarette smoke. This new paper by Farsalinos and his team looks like it is going to prove his theory that unrealistic dry-puff conditions is the reason behind such results... and then some.

I suspected this to taste a bit like some lemon toffee candy called Fox that we have here in Norway, and probably elsewhere at least in Scandinavia. Been a while since I tasted them, but I remember them clearly from when I was a kid. Smelling it confirmed this also, as the smell instantly reminded me of the candy. Tasting it it is maybe a tiny bit less sweet than the candy, but that's not a bad thing. The taste still reminds me of the candy, but I guess it can also be described as pure lemon juice, perfectly sweetened with sugar. Easily one of the most authentic fruit juices I've tried, and I bet it tastes even better on a hot summer day. Really great stuff this. Highly recommended, and I'm not saying that just because it's Norwegian (and that picture actually looks a bit like my dog, a Finnish Spitz), but I mean it. If you're into citrus juices... this is the one you need to try out.
Mountain Smoke is the result of Rogers efforts to create a tobacco e-liquid that actually tasted something like what he was used to when smoking. Now I'm not sure what Roger used to smoke, and to be honest I didn't worry to much about how my cigarettes tasted back when I was smoking either so I can't really say I recognize any specific brand. But this I think is as close as it gets. Very authentic tobacco taste. The only other juices I've tasted with that is as authentic as this one is the tobacco steeps from House of Liquid. It's also has a sweetness to it that I like. In some way it kind of pronounces the tobacco flavour as well. I don't really vape tobacco juices that often since a lot of them taste like... well not tobacco, and the House of Liquid line clogs up coils very fast so I save those for special occasions, but this one could make for a great all day vape. Actually every vaper should have some of this available at all times so you can give some to those smokers who says they want to try vaping but want something that tastes like tobacco. This will be the juice I recommend for these people from now on. So did Roger achieve his goal of creating an e-juice that tastes like real tobacco? Hell yeah!

The Norwegian Union of Vapers demands to be taken seriously!
The Norwegian Union of Vapers is an organization for users of electronic cigarettes, also known as vapers. Vaping has become our way to a tobacco-free life. We wish to urge the Minister of Health to look at vaping with an unprejudiced gaze. We have a common interest in a health policy based on knowledge, not on prejudice or moralism.
Much of the scepticism towards vaping is based on the visual similarities between vapor from e-cigarettes and tobacco smoke, and that vaping, like smoking, is a way to enjoy nicotine. However, this is the only similarity between vaping and smoking. Available research is unambiguous; the harm potential of vaping is far from that of tobacco smoking. The research is openly available and much of it is conveyed to the Norwegian public through SIRUS reports. We who have switched from tobacco smoking to vaping have felt on our own bodies that the health benefits are substantial. Some have gotten rid of their nicotine dependency, others have not. What we have in common is that we are no longer users of a dangerous product.
Opponents of vaping base their arguments on the "precautionary principle". It is difficult to understand how this can be applied here. Research, recently communicated through a SIRUS report 1/2015, shows that vaping appeals almost exclusively to smokers. Those who vape have either quit smoking completely, or partly replaced cigarettes with vaping. We know the consequences of cigarette smoking. Ten years of experience with vaping has not revealed any health hazards. We also know that it is not only illogical to go from vaping to smoking, but also that such behavior is not known from the real world. Is it plausible that the risk of unknown health consequences in the future is big enough to overshadow this?
We in The Norwegian Union of Vapers have found that vaping is not a drug, nor tobacco, but an alternative stimulant. This is what makes it so effective. A deadly habit replaced by an equally satisfactory, but far less harmful hobby. A future regulatory scheme must facilitate market access for products that appeal to current smokers and vapers. Products must not be regulated as drugs or as tobacco products. Under such circumstances they will meet requirements that can only be fulfilled by financially strong manufacturers like the pharmaceutical and tobacco industries. None of these industries have an interest that all smokers becomes vapers. However, this is the interest of the companies that exclusively manufacture vaping products, but the majority of these are small companies with limited funds. The Norwegian Union of Vapers wishes to be taken seriously by the authorities and be consulted on matters that are important to us. We have experience and expertise on the topic. Our goal is that the smokers who are not able or willing to quit otherwise, shall have a far less damaging alternative.

A couple of days ago I read this story about a guy getting arrested for selling drugs that people could put in their e-cigarettes. Damn, more fuel to the fire. I'm sure some of the ANTZ will pick up on this and use it to create some kind of scaremongering story blaming e-cigarettes for teen drug abuse, and I'm not sure I can be bothered to write another post about how many household devices that are perfectly capable of doubling as equipment used for taking drugs. Go ahead, ban bottles cause they can be used to smoke pot right?